Host Colin Jost DESTROYED Harry and Meghan Live On The SNL Stage
President Trump also announced a new trade deal with the UK that will reopen British markets for American companies. All that Britain demands in return is that we keep these two.
What if the American dream Harry and Meghan fought so hard for just became America’s biggest joke? In a jaw-dropping moment on Saturday Night Live, host Colin Jost delivered a punchline that sent shock waves across the globe. He joked that the UK’s new trade deal with the US came with one major condition: America has to keep Harry and Meghan. No returns, no exchanges.
It was more than just a joke. It was a brutal reflection of shifting public opinion. The couple, once hailed as symbols of freedom and resilience, are now being mocked as unwanted guests on American soil. But what does this mean for their carefully constructed image? Is this just another late-night jab? Or is it the beginning of a deeper cultural shift? And more importantly, how did it all go so wrong for the Sussexes?
“I love it now. Uh, yeah, because that’s what she does. She’s G—she’s been giving the middle finger to the royal family forever. And to see Zaran live, NBC, just calling it for what it is. Uh, I—I love it. I think this is beautiful. The more we can expose Meghan for her atro—atro—”
Before we continue, please hit the like button, subscribe to the channel, and turn on the notification bell for updates.
The stage was set under the bright, glaring lights of Studio 8H in Rockefeller Plaza. The audience, packed shoulder-to-shoulder, buzzed with anticipation. It was another Saturday night in New York City, and the air practically vibrated with the kind of electric excitement that only live television could muster. Studio 8H was a legendary place, a breeding ground for comedic legends, a platform where cultural icons were immortalized—or at times, utterly dismantled. And tonight, it was about to deliver one of its most jaw-dropping moments.
Colin Jost, the quick-witted anchor of Weekend Update, settled into his chair, shuffling through his notes with that familiar smirk. He was flanked by his co-anchor, Michael Che, who leaned back with a grin, ready for what was coming. They had danced this dance before, riffing on the week’s political follies, social scandals, and, of course, the occasional royal misstep. But tonight was different. Tonight, the punchlines would be razor-sharp, aimed with precision at a pair who had increasingly found themselves at the mercy of the world’s scrutiny: Prince Harry and Meghan Markle.
Jost leaned forward, his eyes gleaming with a kind of mischievous energy. “Well,” he began, pausing for effect as the audience hushed. “It looks like the United Kingdom and the United States finally struck a new trade deal. And guess what? It comes with one very special condition.” He paused again, letting the tension build. “America has to keep Harry and Meghan. No returns, no exchanges.”
The crowd erupted. Laughter, genuine and unrestrained, filled the room, swelling in waves. Even Che, usually the more composed of the two, couldn’t help but let out a chuckle, shaking his head. Jost leaned back, basking in the reaction before continuing. “Yeah, apparently the Brits were pretty adamant about that part. They were like, ‘Look, you took them. They’re yours now. We don’t do take-backs.'”
The camera panned across the audience, faces lit up with laughter, some clapping, others wiping their eyes. But amidst the hilarity, there was an undercurrent of something sharper, something more poignant. This wasn’t just a joke. It was a reflection. A mirror held up to the public sentiment that had been simmering for months, maybe even years. The glamorous image of Harry and Meghan, the fairy-tale romance turned escape from royal life, had begun to unravel. In its place stood something different, something far less polished.
Back in California, the couple reportedly watched the segment. Aides later whispered to media outlets that Meghan was furious, her reaction a mixture of disbelief and rage. Harry, too, was said to be visibly upset, pacing the floor, hands running through his hair. The two had become accustomed to the criticism that came with the territory. But this—this was different. This was live, unfiltered, and, worse yet, it was funny. The kind of funny that sticks. The kind of funny that cuts deep because it’s rooted in a painful truth.
To understand why this particular jab hurt so much, one had to look back to the early days of Harry and Meghan’s American journey. When they first crossed the Atlantic, there was a swell of support. They were seen as the brave renegades, the ones who broke away from the iron grip of monarchy to forge their own path. They spoke about mental health, about freedom, about liberation from the constraints of royal duties. Oprah welcomed them into her palatial garden, where secrets spilled like champagne, and the world gasped at their confessions. For a moment, they had the narrative under their control. They were victims of circumstance, fighting for independence and privacy.
But then came the Netflix deal and the Spotify podcasts, and the book, Harry’s explosive memoir that dragged his family’s secrets from the gilded halls of Buckingham Palace into the harsh light of day. The allure began to fade, slowly at first, with murmurs of disapproval. Whispers that perhaps their actions were less about privacy and more about profit, then louder, as their very public pursuit of media opportunities contradicted their proclaimed desire for seclusion. The tide was turning, and in that studio in New York City, Colin Jost gave voice to what many had been thinking for a long time.
Jost wasn’t finished. He continued with a smirk. “I guess it makes sense. I mean, we kept Piers Morgan for years, so I guess this is payback, right?” More laughter. Another wave of applause. Jost’s eyes sparkled as he leaned forward, as if letting the audience in on a secret. “You know, we really tried to send them back. We even put them in a box marked ‘Fragile. Handle with care.’ But the Brits just slapped a sticker on it that said, ‘Return to sender.'”
The joke landed hard. And it wasn’t just because it was funny. It resonated because it echoed a sentiment that had been growing louder. The United States, once eager to embrace the royal defectors, was now starting to wonder what exactly it had signed up for. Harry and Meghan’s high-profile appearances and their frequent criticism of the monarchy had begun to wear thin. Their pleas for privacy, juxtaposed with their relentless pursuit of the spotlight, became fodder for late-night comedians and political commentators alike.
And so, as the laughter died down and the segment wrapped up, a question lingered in the minds of many: Was this the beginning of the end for Harry and Meghan’s American fairy tale, or simply another bump in their gilded but turbulent road? For Jost and the team at SNL, it was just another Saturday night. But for Harry and Meghan, it was something more. It was a stark reminder that public perception was shifting, and for the first time, it seemed like they weren’t in control of the narrative.
If there was any doubt about the impact of Jost’s words, the headlines the next morning erased them. Media outlets across the globe picked up the clip, replaying it over and over. British tabloids gleefully splashed it across their front pages, while American pundits dissected it on morning talk shows. Social media, too, had its say. Memes cropped up almost instantly, some mocking, some scathing. It was a digital wildfire, spreading faster than their team could possibly contain. Meghan’s PR team scrambled, reaching out to media outlets, crafting statements, and preparing damage control. Harry was reportedly livid, calling friends back in the UK to express his disbelief. For them, it was a slap in the face. But for the world watching, it was something else entirely. It was a moment of levity, a crack in the facade that had for so long been carefully constructed.
Yet beneath the humor, there was something more sinister brewing. The joke was a harbinger, a sign that perhaps the honeymoon phase was over. That America, once enchanted by the royal renegades, was starting to tire of the endless drama. And while Jost moved on to his next punchline, the ramifications of that night would echo far beyond the stage of Studio 8H.
To fully understand the gravity of Colin Jost’s sharp, cutting words on the SNL stage, one must first dive into the intricate tapestry of Harry and Meghan’s public journey since their royal departure. What began as a fairy-tale romance, marked by a lavish royal wedding and the promise of modernizing the monarchy, quickly spiraled into a whirlwind of controversy, media frenzy, and global division. Colin Jost’s joke was not just a jab. It was a public affirmation of a sentiment that had been simmering for a long time: a sentiment that Harry and Meghan’s American dream was far more complicated and far less welcomed than they might have anticipated.
It’s crucial to rewind to that pivotal moment in early 2020 when Harry and Meghan announced their decision to step back as senior members of the British royal family. The world watched with bated breath as the couple declared their intention to seek financial independence and divide their time between North America and the United Kingdom. It was a move that stunned royal watchers and shook the very foundations of the monarchy. This wasn’t just another royal couple seeking a quieter life. It was the Queen’s grandson and his American wife, openly stepping away from centuries of tradition.
At first, the narrative was spun with the deftness of a seasoned PR team. The couple presented themselves as the victims of a hostile press, an unforgiving family, and an outdated institution. Meghan spoke openly about the pressures she faced as a biracial woman marrying into the most prominent family in the world. Harry, too, expressed his frustrations, alluding to the trauma of losing his mother and his fear of history repeating itself. The public, for the most part, was sympathetic. Their struggles were seen as genuine, their desire for freedom admirable.
But as the months rolled on, the optics began to shift. The Sussexes relocated to California, setting up residence in the affluent neighborhood of Montecito, a place synonymous with celebrity luxury and secluded opulence. The move seemed strategic, positioning them alongside Hollywood elites while they embarked on new ventures. Their Netflix deal, reportedly worth a staggering $100 million, was announced with much fanfare. A Spotify deal followed soon after. Their Archewell Foundation promised to be a beacon of philanthropy and change. The narrative they had spun in their exit from royal life was now being monetized, broadcasted for all to see. Documentaries, interviews, podcasts… Suddenly, their privacy seemed less of a priority and more of a convenient talking point.
It wasn’t long before public sentiment began to shift. The couple, once viewed as brave escapees from the clutches of royal rigidity, started to be perceived as opportunistic. Criticism grew louder as their every move seemed calculated for maximum exposure. Their highly publicized interview with Oprah Winfrey served as the tipping point. For some, it was a moment of raw honesty and bravery. For others, it reeked of betrayal and self-aggrandizement. Allegations of racism, claims of being cut off financially, and confessions of mental health struggles filled the two-hour special. But as the dust settled, questions began to surface. Were their claims entirely truthful? Were they genuinely seeking privacy? Or had they simply traded one stage for another?
This growing skepticism made them easy targets for satire and criticism. Late-night hosts poked fun at their interviews, their public statements, and their perpetual presence in the news. Memes circulated online depicting Harry and Meghan as fame-hungry and insatiable for attention. Satirical cartoons in British tabloids regularly featured exaggerated depictions of the couple, clutching microphones and cameras, desperately seeking the limelight they once claimed to shun.
It was against this backdrop that Colin Jost’s comments landed. His punchline about the United States being stuck with the Sussexes wasn’t just a quip. It was a reflection of what many Americans had begun to feel. The novelty had worn off. The fairy tale had lost its sheen. And what remained was a glaring contradiction: a couple who demanded privacy while simultaneously dominating the airwaves. For Jost to deliver this critique live on SNL, a show watched by millions, was a cultural moment.
It was satire with a sharp edge, a comedic reflection of public sentiment that many had been too polite or too cautious to express openly. And it cut deep because it wasn’t just funny; it was true. The laughter that erupted in the studio wasn’t merely at the expense of the Sussexes. It was a release, a communal acknowledgment that the honeymoon phase with Harry and Meghan had ended. America, it seemed, was starting to grow weary of its royal imports.
And yet, the pain of Jost’s comments went deeper than mere public perception. For Harry, it was a brutal reminder that his self-imposed exile had not shielded him from criticism. It had only changed its form. In Britain, he was criticized for stepping away from his duties, abandoning his role, and turning his back on the monarchy. In America, the narrative was evolving into something else entirely. He was now seen not as the rebellious prince fighting for his family’s safety, but as a symbol of privilege and contradiction. The very country he had fled to for sanctuary and understanding was now turning on him, mocking him on live television, laughing at his attempts to secure a new identity outside the palace walls.
For Meghan, it was an equally stinging rebuke. Her carefully curated public image—one of strength, resilience, and progressive ideals—was being dismantled not by tabloid headlines, but by the very medium she had sought to leverage: American media. Jost’s joke, though brief, encapsulated a broader disillusionment with the couple’s narrative. It was no longer just about escaping royal oppression. It had become about their seeming inability to stay out of the spotlight, their insistence on telling their side of the story over and over again, even when the audience had begun to tune out.
Behind the scenes, their team scrambled to contain the fallout. PR strategists debated issuing a statement, a rebuttal to Jost’s cutting words, but the risk of appearing petty or thin-skinned loomed large. Meghan reportedly called upon her inner circle, venting frustration over the American media’s shifting tide. Harry, meanwhile, was said to be livid, pacing back and forth in their Montecito mansion, replaying the segment in his head. It was a stark reminder that their new life was not immune to criticism. If anything, it was even more exposed.
What hurt the most, perhaps, was the realization that their dream of crafting a new legacy in America was slipping out of their control. Colin Jost’s joke was not just a punchline. It was a reflection of an undercurrent of sentiment that had been building for months, if not years. A sentiment that Harry and Meghan, far from being oppressed truth-tellers, were starting to resemble the very thing they claimed to despise: celebrities desperate for relevance. And as the laughter faded from Studio 8H, the world was left with a lingering question: Had America finally grown tired of its royal refugees? Or was this merely the beginning of a long, drawn-out reckoning for Harry and Meghan’s public image? For the couple watching from the comfort of their Californian estate, the answer was far from clear. But one thing was certain: The fairy tale had cracked, and the world was laughing.
To understand the seismic shift in public perception surrounding Harry and Meghan, one must trace the journey back to its origins: the wedding that captivated the world. On May 19th, 2018, Windsor Castle was transformed into the backdrop of what many believed to be the beginning of a new era for the British monarchy. The ceremony was watched by millions across the globe, a fairy-tale union between a British prince and an American actress. Meghan Markle, with her impeccable poise and humanitarian background, was hailed as a symbol of modernization for the royal family. She was more than just Harry’s wife. She was seen as a beacon of change, a progressive voice that would breathe new life into centuries-old traditions. The world watched with hope and anticipation.
But beneath the glamour and the global adoration, cracks were already forming. Their courtship had been rapid, a whirlwind, some might say. Harry and Meghan had met on a blind date set up by a mutual friend, and within months, their romance blossomed into an engagement that captivated the press. Their story seemed too perfect: The rebellious prince, haunted by the loss of his mother, finding solace and strength in the arms of a strong, independent woman who had carved out her own path in Hollywood. It was a narrative that practically wrote itself. The global media ate it up, splashing their faces across every tabloid and television screen.
But the fairy tale began to unravel almost as soon as it began. For insiders at the palace, whispers of discord started to seep into the corridors of Buckingham and Kensington. Meghan’s American approach to royal life reportedly clashed with centuries of tradition. Staff members leaked stories to the press about her demanding nature, her refusal to follow protocol, and her insistence on doing things her own way. British tabloids latched onto these stories, crafting a narrative that painted Meghan as a divisive force, an outsider who refused to conform. Public opinion, however, remained largely in their favor, at least initially. The birth of their son, Archie, in May 2019, was seen as a joyous occasion, a moment of unity. The couple continued their charitable work, traveling to Africa to shine a light on issues of mental health and women’s rights.
It was during this period that cracks in the facade began to show. Meghan’s candid confession during an ITV interview, where she admitted to struggling and feeling unsupported, was both raw and unexpected. For many, it was a moment of empathy. For others, it was the beginning of what would be seen as a public unraveling.
The announcement that shook the world came on January 8th, 2020. In a move that blindsided the royal family, Harry and Meghan took to Instagram to announce their decision to step back as senior members of the royal family. They intended to become financially independent and split their time between North America and the United Kingdom. The Queen, reportedly blindsided by the announcement, called for an emergency summit at Sandringham. For the first time, the world witnessed the very public negotiation of royal duties, finances, and titles. It was a spectacle, and the Sussexes were at the center of it.
The term “Megxit,” coined by the British tabloids, soon entered the public lexicon. For many, it symbolized Meghan’s influence over Harry, the idea that she had lured him away from his family and his duties. The couple insisted it was a joint decision, but the press and public were less convinced. British headlines grew sharper, more critical. Harry, once the beloved prince, the cheeky, daring brother of William, was now seen as a man forsaking his legacy. Meghan, for her part, was cast as the villain, an American interloper who had disrupted the monarchy.
When they relocated to California, the initial response was muted curiosity. Their lavish Montecito mansion, reportedly worth $14 million, became the epicenter of their new life. It was here that the real PR push began. Their Netflix and Spotify deals were announced in quick succession, alongside the formation of the Archewell Foundation. At first, it seemed promising, an opportunity for them to shape their own narrative, free from the constraints of royal obligations. But the strategy soon backfired. The couple’s insistence on privacy, juxtaposed with their very public ventures, quickly became a source of ridicule.
Their much-anticipated interview with Oprah Winfrey, billed as a no-holds-barred look into their experiences, was the tipping point. It was an extraordinary interview: two hours of shocking revelations, accusations of racism, claims of financial abandonment, and discussions of mental health struggles. Meghan spoke openly about contemplating suicide, while Harry revealed the fracture between him and his family. For many viewers, it was a moment of brutal honesty, a stark window into the gilded cage of royalty. But for others, it was too much. The idea that two people living in a multi-million dollar mansion in one of the wealthiest parts of America were victims did not resonate with everyone. Criticism mounted. Piers Morgan famously stormed off the set of Good Morning Britain after clashing with his co-host about Meghan’s allegations.
Public opinion polls showed a dip in their popularity, particularly in the United Kingdom, where the monarchy still held strong cultural significance. The backlash wasn’t limited to Britain. In the United States, where initially the couple had been welcomed with open arms, public sentiment began to shift. Media outlets grew more critical, analyzing their public appearances with a sharper lens.
The couple’s decision to release a Netflix documentary detailing their “truth” and their struggles was met with mixed reactions. Some praised their bravery; others saw it as overexposure, a relentless attempt to control the narrative. Their Spotify podcast, too, became a flashpoint. Meghan’s attempts at hosting, discussing female empowerment, mental health, and resilience were well-meaning, but often criticized as shallow or out of touch. The audience, it seemed, was growing weary of their story. The once-avid fascination with their lives began to wane, replaced by fatigue and skepticism. How many times could they tell the same story? How many interviews would it take to truly feel understood?
Behind the scenes, it was reported that Harry was struggling with the weight of his decisions. Sources close to the couple suggested that he missed elements of his royal life, particularly his military connections, which he had been forced to relinquish upon leaving. Meghan, meanwhile, was rumored to be pushing forward, scheduling interviews, arranging public appearances, and negotiating deals. The public, for its part, watched as the cracks in their once-glamorous facade grew wider.
The real blow came with the revelation of their declining popularity. Polls in both the United States and the United Kingdom showed steep drops in approval ratings. They were no longer seen as the bold escapees from royal oppression, but as celebrities leveraging their titles for financial gain. Public sentiment had shifted from sympathy to skepticism. And for the first time, it seemed like the couple was losing control of the narrative.
By the time Colin Jost delivered his punchline on SNL, the stage had already been set. His quip about America keeping the Sussexes was more than just a joke. It was a reflection of a broader public sentiment. People were growing tired of the constant media appearances, the relentless interviews, and the never-ending public grievances. What had started as a fairy tale had transformed into something else entirely, a spectacle that many were beginning to question. Comedy, as it turns out, is one of the most potent tools for shaping public perception.
